IT Project Rescue · Crisis Engagement · DACH

When things are on fire, call us.

Senior architect leads. Team Charlie delivers.

19% of all IT projects fail outright, 50% go off the rails. For programs over €10M, the success rate drops below 10% (Standish CHAOS). Three ways in before your project becomes a statistic: co-lead with your team, lead alone, or orderly stop. Focus areas: Spryker, SAP Commerce, commercetools, Salesforce Commerce Cloud.

Market reality

The bigger the project,
the more often it collapses.

Standish CHAOS distribution across IT projects: 31% successful, 50% challenged, 19% failed. What rarely gets communicated: at project volumes over €10M the success rate tips below 10% — ten times the cancel rate of small projects. That's exactly where we get called.

~ 60% Small projects · Success

Projects under €1M deliver in the majority — small team, clear scope, short time horizon, low political complexity.

Source: Standish Group · CHAOS Report
31% Mid-market · Success

In the classic mid-market project range, only one third hits the target. 50% go off the rails, 19% fail outright. Cancel risk real, cost overruns the norm, scope reductions the rule — exactly where mid-market programs typically sit.

Source: Standish Group · CHAOS Report
< 10% Large projects · Success

At volumes over €10M, fewer than one in ten projects reaches its goal — ten times the cancel rate of small projects. This is our territory.

Source: Standish Group · CHAOS Report · McKinsey

Anyone starting a €10M program is calculating with 90% probability of cancel, cost overrun, or scope reduction. That's exactly the starting point we get called into.

What the triage finds

Six breaking points
we almost always see.

In the first phase of a rescue mandate, we look across six axes: architecture, code, vendor, team, sponsor, delivery plan. In most mandates we find the actual break on at least four of them. Here are the recurring patterns.

  1. 01

    Scope drift

    Requirements grow, stop conditions are missing

  2. 02

    Vendor mismatch

    Platform doesn't fit B2B reality

  3. 03

    Integration debt

    Point-to-point spaghetti instead of a hub

  4. 04

    Team erosion

    Key engineer already half-checked out

  5. 05

    Sponsor change

    Original champion has been replaced

  6. 06

    Status fiction

    Traffic lights green, delivery red

In eight out of ten mandates, the first finding is not "the platform is wrong" — it's "governance has lost the ground", and has been doing so long before anyone officially says so. Every fracture pushes OpEx over plan — procurement usually notices only in the delivery report, once the cash is already spent.

Three escalation levels

What we write on one page for the board.

After the triage we deliver an assessment with three levels — each with clear criteria and a clear course of action. No "traffic light" theater — decision-ready language for the steering committee.

  1. Level 01

    At risk, but recoverable.

    Delivery cadence lost, trust between sponsor and team strained, but the foundation holds. Platform choice is sound, architecture is healthy at the core. We go in as co-lead with Team Charlie — reorder the backlog and delivery cadence, close the trust gap.

    Recommendation
    Co-lead
    With your team
    Handover after stabilization
  2. Level 02

    Critical. Crisis mode.

    Multiple breaking points simultaneously: architecture debt, key departures, vendor conflict. The steering committee doesn't yet know how serious it is. We take operational lead, escalate honestly to C-level, make hard scope decisions.

    Recommendation
    Crisis lead
    FatUnicorn as program owner
    Handover after stabilization + re-plan
  3. Level 03

    Orderly wind-down.

    Rare, but it happens: a combination of vendor dead-end, organizational break, and economic reality makes continuation pointless. We recommend an orderly wind-down over a façade of continuation.

    Recommendation
    Stop & re-start
    Honest damage containment
    Orderly handover, re-plan support

Level 03 rarely applies — when it does: sunk cost is sunk. The next €5M won't save the plan. Honest damage containment beats a façade of continuation every time.

Delivery organization

When the senior alone isn't enough: Team Charlie joins.

Senior architect leads. Four to fourteen specialists join as needed — architecture, engineering, project lead, AI workflow. No junior pyramid, no bench. Whoever shows up has delivered this multiple times.

Team Charlie in detail
Voices from rescue mandates

What clients took away.

Three voices from three different rescue constellations — a Spryker upgrade emergency, a complex multi-stakeholder landscape, four years of senior sparring building a delivery organization. Each with a different break, each with a different solution.

NanoTemper · Spryker upgrade emergency
"Our lifeline on problems where every other developer had failed — at our side whenever it got tight." — Jan Sterl, Software Architect

Spryker platform upgrade in a stalled setup. Standard dev teams had given up. Pragmatic problem solving, cost-effective handover to the internal org.

Multi-stakeholder program
"Technical depth combined with strategic perspective. Navigation through complex system landscapes and different teams." — Martin Kousek

Complex eCommerce program with multiple partner agencies, internal teams, and vendor relationships. Architecture depth and stakeholder navigation in one mandate — without team politics.

TOWA · 2021 – 2025
"Trust at every level of an organization — from the dev team to C-level. Calm, reliable, solution-focused." — Karsten Krause-Ablaß, TOWA

Four years of senior sparring building and scaling a Spryker practice. Bridge between engineering reality and board communication — exactly the bridging capability that makes the difference in rescue mandates.

Experience & contact

Deep platform expertise.

25 years in IT, 14 of them in B2B commerce. Architecture mandates with large enterprises, building and steering distributed expert teams, vendor-neutral project rescue. Focus areas: platform architecture, project rescue, team operations.

Chris Zepernick

Senior consultant · Hamburg

Before you call

Four questions, four straight answers.

"Do we have to replace the existing implementer?"
Rarely. Switching implementers is expensive, demoralizing, and often doesn't fix the actual breaking points. We typically go in as an additional senior lead — stabilize with the existing setup and hand over cleanly. We only recommend a switch when the vendor relationship itself is the break.
"What if we don't have internal capacity to keep up?"
Then Team Charlie scales. Senior architect + project lead + engineering in co-lead mode — up to 15 heads as needed. Important: we're not filling your permanent positions. We fill the gap until your team can breathe again, and step back as soon as the internal org can carry it alone.
"How quickly do you have an assessment?"
First read on the phone. Written triage assessment after the first on-site days covering architecture, code, team, and stakeholders. We don't deliver an 80-slide report — one page of escalation level recommendations for the board, plus a lever list for the operational level. Terms are mandate-specific.
"How do we map the three levels to our budget?"
Co-lead: your team carries operationally, we place a senior lead as sparring alongside — lowest FU share in the delivery mix. Crisis-lead: we take operational responsibility, higher FU share, Team Charlie scales as needed. Stop & re-start: we prevent re-investment in an uncertain trajectory — damage contained, not extended. Terms per level are mandate-specific, discussed on the phone.
What we have learned

Stabilization is co-lead, not takeover.

We sit next to your team, not in front of it. After the mandate, your org carries it alone — we make ourselves redundant. Anyone who creates dependency hasn't understood the job.

How we work

Is it burning?

Call directly. We listen first, then tell you whether and how we can help.